King Sheep Productions

Unassuming amusement
  • Home
  • Comics
    • Coming Distractions
    • Simon Archive
  • Galleries
    • Art of Nate Taylor
  • About
  • Store

Why Casual Games Make Me Seem Crazy

by Major Sheep on June 17, 2009 at 10:22 am
Posted In: Uncategorized

It’s funny what a guy will do for love, for the joy of a shared experience with his spouse.  Case in point, my wife is an addict of Facebook.  Nightly, she roams the fields of this simulated society, chatting up old friends and poring over endless, endless status updates, photos, and notes.

If you frequent Facebook at all, then you’re familiar with the myriad games that whimper for your attention on every sidebar of every page along with the ads for insightful IQ quizzes.  Becky’s particular brand of poison is Farm Town, a game that is childish in its simplicity and so graphically cute that I would be embarassed to be seen playing it, much less enjoying it.

But I do play it.  A lot.

The reason for this has two parts.  First, I am an immersive gamer, so when I play a game I like to get into it.  I don’t like Pinball or Bejeweled.  I like Final Fantasy and Warcraft.  But these are not games my wife enjoys.  She will play Tetris until your eyes start bleeding, then she’ll beg for another go.  So since the mountain could not come to Mohammed, I came to Farm Town.  But I’ve made it something it wasn’t meant to be.

I chose my farm’s name to denote both power and whimsy.  My fields are organized and arrayed for maximum efficiency and ease of movement within them, and my crops are selected for their profit margins.  I’m not making a farm.  I’m making an vegetable empire.

But that’s not really something you can really do in Farm Town.  The dark, warm part of my soul that wishes for conquest and resource control must remain unsatisfied in this family-friendly game.  So why am I not spending my free time playing those ever-immersive MMOs instead, you may ask?  The second part of my reason:  I don’t have a lot of time.

Most of the people who enjoy MMOs are either successful businesspersons who are satisfied with their lives, or unsuccessful slackers who are satisfied with their lives.  I am an unsuccessful artist who is dissatisfied.  So my free time needs to be spent working towards a more satisfying life.  Preferrably one that includes business meetings in hot tubs, and creating new and exciting ways to entertain the world.

So wave to me when you see me trying to orchestrate an offensive against the blue diamonds on my Bejeweled screen, and don’t giggle too loudly when notice that my thumbs involuntarily work invisible analog sticks to strafe around the corner and fire my rocket launcher.

I am the orphan of expensive games.  Hear me mew.

Comments Off on Why Casual Games Make Me Seem Crazy

06/15/2009

by Major Sheep on June 15, 2009 at 12:01 am
Posted In: Comic
Comments Off on 06/15/2009

1 2 3 – Imagine Taking Moon Food

by King Sheep on June 12, 2009 at 11:31 pm
Posted In: Blog, movie reviews

What an odd week for movies. There’s a remake of a 1970’s thriller that I’d never heard of, a psychological piece of science fiction staring Sam Rockwell, a documentary that will scare you out of eating, and an Eddie Murphy movie where he only plays one character.  Since last week was all about the Hangover, this week seems like the first post-drunk meal.  Your stomach still isn’t settled yet and some food (eggs and sausage) just doesn’t taste right while odd things (like fruit garnish) taste amazing. So, let’s start with the garnish.

food_inc_xlg
Food Inc. (RT – 90% M – 81%) a documentary about the business of food and how food conglomerates don’t think it’s your business to know what’s in it.

“Eating can be one dangerous business. Don’t take another bite till you see Robert Kenner’s Food, Inc., an essential, indelible documentary that is scarier than anything in the last five Saw horror shows.” Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Don’t sell the scary too much.  The truth, however inconvenient, can be a serious bummer.

“Food, Inc. is hard to shake, because days after you’ve seen it, you may find yourself eating something — a cookie, a piece of poultry, cereal out of the box, a perfectly round waxen tomato — and you’ll realize that you have virtually no idea what it actually is.” Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

Well, the last one was wax.  Don’t eat that.  But as important as the documentary might be, what reason is there to see it in theaters rather than wait for video/DVD/Blu-Ray?

“The sheer scale of the movie is mind-blowing–it touches on every aspect of modern life. It’s the documentary equivalent of “The Matrix”: It shows us how we’re living in a simulacrum, fed by machines run by larger machines with names like Monsanto, Perdue, Tyson, and the handful of other corporations that make everything.” New York Magazine David Edelstein

Whoa, it’s the Matrix of documentaries.  It could only be cooler if it had Keanu Reeves in it.  And speaking of science fiction (never SyFy), who knew that this weekend would release a new classic (or a so classic it’s like new) exploration of humanity in Moon (RT – 84% / M -68%)?  Directed by David Bowie’s son, it’s likely to remind people that truly great science fiction focuses on its ideas rather than its special effects.

moon_poster_sam_rockwell

“Moon is a potent provocation that relies on ideas instead of computer tricks to stir up excitement.” Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Dude, I just said that.  Anyway, this movie sounds like a mesmerizing tale of loneliness and reflection on life.

“An assured, mesmerizing tale of intergalactic loneliness, self-inquiry, and man’s innate, enduring hunger for life.” Nick Schager Slant Magazine

Did I read that somewhere before?  It’s like there are two of me and I’m reading my own mind.  Does that blow your mind?

“Should be enthusiastically greeted by serious sci-fi devotees, because it’s a smart story that doesn’t spell everything out but isn’t maddeningly ambiguous, either.” Eric D. Snider EricDSnider.com

Since nothing will be as maddeningly ambiguous as my comments for this section, let’s slingshot around the moon one more time with why you might want to remember to see this one.

“One of the most compelling sci-fi films of the past 20 years.” Scott Weinberg FEARnet

“In an age when most big-budget science fiction films are made by people with no respect for science or fiction, Moon is a welcome pleasure.” James Rocchi Cinematical

“”Moon” is the best sci-fi movie to come along in a generation or two.” Cole Smithey ColeSmithey.com

Moon has been sold.  Moving on to the movies that are actually going to draw big audiences this weekend, lead by Denzel Washington and John Travolta in Tony Scott’s remake of Joseph Sargent’s 1970’s thriller: The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (RT 52% – M 58%).

taking_of_pelham_1-2-3_2009

Since the preview was ‘Meh’, the critics are ‘Meh’, what’s going to put people in the seats?

“Pelham 123 exploits urban anxiety without relief or understanding. Using exacerbation as entertainment, it is simply an I HATE NY ad.” Armond WhitevNew York Press

ARMONNNND!

“Scott gets into the zip and rush of urban energy with an enthusiasm bordering on hilarity.” Entertainment Weekly  Lisa Schwarzbaum

It’s hilariously energetic with enthusiasm.

“Travolta barks and giggles and screams, as if creating a memorable nemesis was simply a matter of calling more attention to yourself than anyone else.” Josh Larsen LarsenOnFilm

“Loud, abrasive, and featuring performances seemingly calibrated to be heard over the cacophonous roar of Travolta’s mad, bad overacting.” Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

Any actor that plays his part by barking, roaring, giggling and screaming at least has range.  So what’s the low down on this subway thriller?

“There’s not much wrong with Tony Scott’s The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, except that there’s not much really right about it.” Chicago Sun-Times  Roger Ebert

Meh.  Last up is the desert of this little meal.  An Eddy Murphy movie.  He’s been a true champion of terrible movies for the better part of a decade.  I can hear the shirt sleeves of critics everywhere rolling up before a written flood of frustration and disappointment drowns the last bit of air out the lungs of Eddy’s career.

imagine_that

“At this point, there’s no room left on Murphy’s career coffin for another nail, so consider Imagine That the first shovelful of dirt.” Brian Orndorf BrianOrndorf.com

Yee-ouch.  Next.

“I laughed once during Imagine That’s interminable 107 minutes, and the longer I watched Murphy’s desperate, embarrassing attempts at provoking laughter, the worse I felt.” James Berardinelli ReelViews

Oh, it burns.  One more?

“Mr. Murphy rises to every occasion, not only with the crisp wit that has long been his hallmark, but with restraint and tenderness that serve him well.” Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

Say what?   This is Eddy Murphy we’re talking about.  The guy who brought us Norbit, Pluto Nash, and The Nutty Professor 2: The Klumps.  Did he break his streak?  What kind of numbers did Imagine That get?

Imagine That RT 44% M -55%

Wow, that’s about what Pelham got.  Clearly I was too hard on Mr. Murphy.  Maybe his movie isn’t terrible.  Perhaps it’s decent, maybe even good?  What should I be giving this movie credit for?

“Most family films aim their lessons at children, but some actually have a thing or two for adults to learn.” Perry Seibert TV Guide’s Movie Guide

Interesting.  What’s the lesson?

“The lesson: Kids are never too young to balance a stock portfolio.” Matt Pais Metromix.com

PDJ stopped to ponder

PDJ stopped to ponder

└ Tags: cool, Eddy Murphy, Food Inc, humor, Imagine That, Moon, movies, The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3
Comments Off on 1 2 3 – Imagine Taking Moon Food

Three comedies premiere, two suck, and one critic reviews them all

by King Sheep on June 4, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Posted In: Blog, movie reviews, updates

We are lucky enough this week to have one critic who saw everything.  He will be our reviewer benchmark and we’re even luckier that it’s legendary reviewer Roger Ebert.

The man himself

The man himself

Now, I have an old relationship with Ebert that goes all the way back to the days with Gene Siskel.  I remember on one episode of ‘that thumbs show’ they reviewed The Neverending Story and The Last Starfighter, both of which I thought had been made from 100% pure glowing awesomeness.  However, they managed to give both a split decision and I realized that critics could be full of crap.  Since that time, I’ve taken a small measure of glee whenever their reviews were completely off base.  For example, they gave Speed 2: Cruise Control two thumbs up (mostly because Sandra Bullock was in a bikini).  However, the army of critics has a general for the time being so: to the trenches!  First up, Will Farrell’s comedic remake of a 1970’s Saturday morning serial: Land of the Lost (RT: 18% M: 32%).  Mr. Ebert, would you please do the honors?
land-of-the-lost-poster_517x765“Confronted with such effects, the actors make not the slightest effort to appear terrified, amazed or sometimes even mildly concerned. Some might consider that a weakness. I suspect it is more of a deliberate choice, and I say I enjoyed it…. I guess you have to be in the mood for a goofball picture like this. I guess I was.” Roger Ebert Chicago Sun-Times

General Ebert had the nerve/balls/chutzpah to say he liked it, what about the grunts?

“Modernizing a 1970s children’s TV show known for its cheap special effects offered certain possibilities, but the filmmakers have traded in any kid-friendly elements for bathroom humor of dinosaur-sized proportions.” Brian Lowry Variety

But dinosaur turds are comedy gold for kids.  Besides, if Jurassic Park can do poo, LOL can too.

"What do you mean, you don't have any hand sanitizer?"

"What do you mean, you don't have any hand sanitizer?"

“Land of the Lost is halfway toward amusing, which means it’s just as close to awful.” Nick Schager Slant Magazine

Does it have to be an idiomatic question of the movie being half awful or half amusing rather than merely adequate?

“Boasts a lewd monkey man fond of fondling human private parts without permission, apparently not a felony in prehistoric times, boob sign language chuckles, Tyrannosaurus tongue baths, and moments of humor that seem to arrive centuries apart.” Prairie Miller NewsBlaze

Centuries apart?  How long is this movie?

“Would that a time machine actually existed that could somehow restore the 106 minutes spent watching Land of the Lost.” Peter Keough Boston Phoenix

Hell, if time machines existed, I doubt that refunding your time in the theater would be a priority.  Wouldn’t you rather play the stock market, make some sports bets, or visit Dallas in November 1963, stand on the grassy knoll, and yell “duck!”  (mildly offensive joke courtesy of Red Dwarf).

“Dull, unfunny, and completely unsuitable for viewing by anyone who isn’t a charter member of the Will Farrell fan club.” James Berardinelli ReelViews

Will Ferrell’s fan club currently has 1501 fans (I’ve never heard of Will Farrell).  However, I doubt the fans will be willing to see LOL enough times to cover the $100 million budget.  All right, it’s a hatefest despite Ebert’s enjoyment.  Let’s unleash the angriest critic in America on this one and see what’s left after he shreds it to itty-bitty pieces.

Angriest critic in America or Roger Ebert fan club member?

Angriest critic in America or Roger Ebert fan club member?

“Land of the Lost sheds its TV-formula origins as a 1970s network series and becomes glib fun.” Armond White New York Press

Seriously?  Armond liked it?  While I’m reeling from the fact that Ebert and Armond agree, let’s take a look at a the next film from My Big Fat Greek Wedding star/writer Nia Vardalos: My Life In Ruins (RT: 9% – M: 35%).
my_life_in_ruins“Ruins is sometimes as sunny as its locations but as familiar and predictable as a Greek diner.” The Hollywood Reporter Doris Toumarkine

I can’t tell if that’s a positive or negative review.

“Feels like warmed-over souvlaki.” Variety Lael Loewenstein

Still confused.  Ebert, do you want to help out?

“Rarely has a film centered on a character so superficial and unconvincing, played with such unrelenting sameness. I didn’t hate it so much as feel sorry for it.” Chicago Sun-Times  Roger Ebert

Ouch.  Anyone else?

“Embarrassingly bad. Will kill Greece tourism. A torturous bore.” Victoria Alexander FilmsInReview.com

Wow.  A movie can single-handedly end tourism to an entire country?  Let’s hope that Vegas doesn’t share a similar fate thanks to the bachelor party gone wrong comedy: The Hangover (RT: 83% – M: 79%).  Mr. Ebert, how did part 3 of your weekend entertainment options fare?
hangover_poster
“Now this is what I’m talkin’ about. The Hangover is a funny movie, flat out, all the way through. Its setup is funny. Every situation is funny.” Roger Ebert Chicago Sun-Times

All right.  That’s what he’s talkin’ about.  Let’s hear from the critics who lined up to agree with him.

“This surefire summer hit might even get Vegas back on a winning streak.” Rex Roberts Film Journal International

“…I think I can safely predict that “The Hangover” will join March’s “I Love You Man” as one of the funniest films of the year.” Michael A. Smith Nolan’s Pop Culture Review

“The Hangover instantly has the feel of one for the ages.” Austin Chronicle  Kimberley Jones

“… Just might be the funniest movie of the decade.” Greg Maki Star-Democrat (Easton, MD)

Hangover be damned.  Let’s party.  Enjoy your weekend.

PDJ has equal chances of having a hangover and seeing Land of the Lost this weekend

PDJ has equal chances of enjoying a hangover and Land of the Lost this weekend

└ Tags: cool, Dinosaur Poo, humor, Land Of the Lost, movies, My Life In Ruins, Roger Ebert, The Hangover, Will Ferrell
Comments Off on Three comedies premiere, two suck, and one critic reviews them all

Drag Me Up, Brother

by King Sheep on May 29, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Posted In: movie reviews, updates

We have emerged from the tunnel of action films and entered the wide-open spaces of summer entertainment.  Up until this week, most multiplexes hosted only superhero and science fiction actioners.  Now, Hollywood has laid out a plethora of options for you.  From Pixar’s distilled family-friendliness (Up) to Sam Raimi’s laugh-then-shriek camp horror (Drag Me To Hell) with a whimsical crime comedy (The Brother’s Bloom) in between, if you’re in the mood for a movie this weekend, you don’t have to settle for Governator-shaped evil robots or hairy Canadians with knives instead of knuckles.  Remarkably, critics agree, all the major movies coming out this weekend are cooltacular, funtastic, and radilicious (or in a word: good).  First up, the best of your options Up: Rotten Tomatoes 98% – Metacritic 89%.
UpposterNow before we get to the critics, I want to put the two reviewer sources I use into context.  Rotten Tomatoes looks at reviewer scores and then determines if their ranking is positive or negative (fresh or rotten).  Usually this is easy if the critic uses a star system or a numeric representation of quality.  So, RT does a summary of how many thumbs up and how many down.  Metacritic is an average of every critic’s score.  In general Metacritic scores are lower than Rotten Tomatoes for good movies and higher for bad movies (for example 80% and higher on Metacritic is listed as “Universal acclaim”).  With that in mind, look again at the scores for Up.  Wow huh?  Here are the reasons why.

“Through its writing, direction and execution, Up doesn’t just achieve hipness, it transcends it. With its spirit of fun and adventure, it echoes Raiders of the Lost Ark (only funnier) — it’s a thrill ride, but a thrill ride with heart.” Bill Goodykoontz Arizona Republic

1. It’s beyond hip, has the heart of a thrill ride, and is funnier than Indiana Jones.

“A near perfect feature, a thrilling combination of humour, pathos, action and drama. Utterly original, endlessly inventive, and brilliantly crafted to appeal to old and young alike, it may well be Pixar’s finest feature yet.” Chris Tilly IGN Movies UK

2. Critics use a lot of positive words to describe it.

“You can tell that this film was a labor of love, and that the cast and crew were sufficiently inspired by the material to craft a children’s movie that is destined to be a classic.” Cole Smithey ColeSmithey.com

3. Everyone loved the thousands of hours they spent working on this film, especially the computer programmers.  Okay, enough with the reasons.  How does it stack up against its competition?

Pixar is a Frightmare for other animation studios

Pixar is a Frightmare for other animation studios

“Yet another Pixar film that’s approximately 3 billion times better than almost all other animated movies.” Matt Pais Metromix.com

Thank goodness he was just approximating (~3,000,000,000), I didn’t want to get the wrong idea about his exaggeration.  However, aren’t we past the point where animated movies are judged based only on their success within the genre?  Pixar consistently proves itself to be the best animation studio around, but if their movies can only be the best-animated movie, then Up’s flying house has officially hit a glass ceiling.

“Many a PIXAR film has been nominated for the Best Animated Feature Academy Award. “UP” may finally be the one to snag a nod as Best Picture, animated or otherwise.” Michael A. Smith Nolan’s Pop Culture Review

All right, now we’re talking.  It’s near perfect, an instant classic, transcendentally hip, and it could be the best picture of the year, what could the angriest critic in America possibly dislike about it?

“All this deflated cinema and Pixarism mischaracterizes what good animation can be (as in Coraline, Monster House, Chicken Little, Teacher’s Pet, The Iron Giant). Up’s aesthetic failure stems from its emotional letdown.” Armond White New York Press

Taking a class from Armond would be HELL

Taking a class from Armond would be HELL

Excuse me while I put my head through the computer screen.  Armond, your taste is officially in question if you think Monster House or Chicken Little can hold an animated candle to anything Pixar has released in the last 10 years.  Okay, clearly I’m letting this guy’s negative vibe get to me, let’s remind ourselves of what ~96% of critics are saying about Up.

“A Pixar pinnacle. That may seem like outlandish praise, given the animation studio’s sterling tax record. But when was the last time you walked out of a Pixar movie simply giddy, as if you were high on computer-animated pixels?” Phil Villarreal Arizona Daily Star

It’s been awhile.  Just like it’s been a while since the lowest reviewed movie of a week was at 61%, but that’s what we find with the stylized, but possibly too-sophisticated-for-its-own-good con man movie: The Brother’s Bloom (Rotten Tomatoes 61% – Metacritic 55%).

the_brothers_bloom_movie_poster“This is either going to sound to you like a high old time or a teeth-grinding exercise in forced frivolity, and that might sum up the appropriate range of responses to The Brothers Bloom.” Andrew O’Hehir Salon.com

So the response range could be translated into drinking with friends or being forced to dress up for Hawaiian shirt day at work?  Most people enjoy the former, but the latter drives some people to put their head through computer screens.

“The Brothers Bloom jerks us around without end. The cons and twists pile up like debris. If The Brothers Bloom had one more twist I would have screamed.” Tony Macklin tonymacklin.net

What if they weren’t really brothers?  AHHHHHH!

What if this was the only movie that played in HELL?  AHHHHHH!!

What if this was the only movie that played in HELL? AHHHHHH!!

“It’s all a con, but thanks to Johnson’s way with characters and dialogue, we don’t mind the hustle so long as we’re rewarded along the way.” Roger Moore Orlando Sentinel

Sounds good, as long as the hustle isn’t scamming me out of $10.

“With Brick Rian Johnson got me excited with his storyteller’s tools; with The Brothers Bloom he used them to transport me. I loved being the mark in this con.” Devin Faraci CHUD

Wait, I’m the mark?  I’m beginning to distrust this movie.

“A screwball comedy for the New Depression, “The Brothers Bloom” makes an abundant number of erudite references that mean almost nothing, and, like most con-man movies, it can’t be trusted.” John Anderson Washington Post

Ah ha!  But then again, any conclusion I reach will be disproved by a future plot twist.  So tell us o’ gallery of critics, in a nutshell, is Brother’s Bloom a thumbs up, thumbs down, or a generally inconclusive aggregate representation of quality?

“I’ll take a flawed, yet charming and clever film over a cookie cutter big budget flick almost any day of the week.” Jimmy O JoBlo’s Movie Emporium

Good call.  Finally, we arrive at the answer to what the HELL has been going on with the pictures, the unexpectedly loved horror film from Sam Raimi (Spiderman and Evil Dead): Drag Me To Hell: Rotten Tomatoes 94%– Metacritic 82%.  The biggest name actor in this film is the Mac guy (Justin Long) and the concept is a throwback to the director’s old days when he would load up actors and equipment and drive off to a cabin in the woods to make a movie.  Only now the actors have their own trailers and they have a special effects department instead of a bucket of Karo syrup (used for blood in many cheap horror movies of yore, including Evil Dead).
drag_me_to_hell_xlg
“I never thought I’d say this. Never. But I have officially forgotten SPIDERMAN 3. I want to hug Sam Raimi. I want to hug him like I did back in the days of EVIL DEAD…Let’s just say that pissing off a gypsy is NOT a good idea…” Jenna Busch JoBlo’s Movie Emporium

Oh yeah, the plot involves gypsy curses.

Hello Mrs. evil gypsy, you don't mind us smirking at your picture right?

Hello Mrs. evil gypsy, are those staples in your forehead?

“Crafted sadism is not held back – it’s a movie Satan himself might have made if he’d got the funding. Raimi’s story weds modern careerism to pagan demonology. The result is a fright-fest with satirical undertones.” Victor Olliver Teletext

And job satire?  However, I’m fascinated by the concept of the Devil making a movie.

“A near-brilliant comedy disguised as a quickie horror flick, Sam Raimi’s Drag Me to Hell is the year’s most frightfully hilarious movie so far.” Rafer Guzman Newsday

The Devil made a comedy?  Well, so long as it’s Devine.

The Devil does his Captain Morgan impression

The Devil does his Captain Morgan impression

“The 99-minute, eye-popping, bowel-twingeing, possessed-talking-goat extravaganza that follows must be one of the scariest things I’ve ever seen in the cinema.” Robbie Collin News of the World

If the Devil made this movie, of course there’s a talking goat.  Well, this roundup is bordering on long as HELL, so let’s give the readers a final word and encourage them to enjoy their weekend while they’re enjoying these movies.

“In modern horror there’s always a line they can’t cross. Drag Me To Hell stabs it, sacrifices it, buries it in the back yard, and then gets away with it by giving the audience a wink and a nod.” Joshua Tyler CinemaBlend.com

PDJ winks then nods

PDJ winks then nods

Final note:

  • This is one of the few movies with Hell in the title that I've seen. Yes, it is awesome. And yes, that is a robo-chastity belt around former WWF wrestler Rowdy Roddy Piper

    This is one of the few movies with Hell in the title that I've seen. Yes, it is awesome. And yes, that is a robo-chastity belt around former WWF wrestler Rowdy Roddy Piper

  • └ Tags: cool, drag me to hell, funny, humor, movies, the brother's bloom, Up
    Comments Off on Drag Me Up, Brother
    • Page 67 of 109
    • « First
    • «
    • 65
    • 66
    • 67
    • 68
    • 69
    • »
    • Last »

    Archives

    DCMA Agent:

    Dean A. Craine, P.S.  9 Lake Bellevue Drive, Ste. 209, Bellevue, WA  98005 (USA).  Telephone Number: (425) 637-3035; Email:  info@ nwpatents.com

    ©2007-2017 King Sheep Productions | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑