King Sheep Productions

Unassuming amusement
  • Home
  • Comics
    • Coming Distractions
    • Simon Archive
  • Galleries
    • Art of Nate Taylor
  • About
  • Store

Castle Question

by Major Sheep on April 3, 2009 at 1:45 am
Posted In: Uncategorized

So I’ve been following the new mid-season start-up murder mystery TV series Castle (ABC Monday, 10pm Pacific).  It’s starring one of my favorite dramedic actors, Nathan Fillion, and has been doing a good job of entertaining me so far.  Entertaining, but maybe not challenging.

The setup goes like this:

Its worth as a source of stimulating mystery was called into question with this last Monday’s episode about a city councilman who turns up dead.  Now, I don’t usually get to watch Castle the night it actually airs because I work nights until about 10:30pm.  My wife, gracious and kind woman that she is, records Castle for me, then comes to pick me up (my car has a big hole in its exhaust pipe and I’m relying on public transit and my darling lady to get around). 

So, anyway, I come in and sit down on the couch, talking with Becky while the show plays on in the background.  After ten minutes of watching while maintaining a husbandly conversation, I say, “The wife did it.” 

Becky looks at me and says, “How on Earth could you know that?”

And that is an excellent question.  In my ten minutes of half-watching, I observed the following: the councilman was sleeping with a prostitute, he was being blackmailed, and his wife was on TV giving speeches about how much her husband loved the city.

So the question is this: am I a Holmsian genius of untapped mystery-solving potential, or was the show employing an exceptionally weak riddle? 

Either way, Castle is still on my Must Watch list for sheer character entertainment power, if nothing else.

Comments Off on Castle Question

Monsters go 12 haunting rounds in Connecticut with Aliens

by King Sheep on March 27, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Posted In: Blog, movie reviews

The big release this week is Dreamworks’s Monsters vs. Aliens (M: 55% – RT: 69%) with solid reviews and a jam-down-your-throat hype assault.  The consensus seems to be that it is an enjoyable, but unoriginal send up of 1950’s science fiction films that today’s kids won’t know.  The best thing about it might be that it takes place in a universe where Stephen Colbert is President.  It’s paired with two forgettable movies that are destined to end up on late night Spike TV: The Haunting in Connecticut and 12 Rounds (staring WWE wrestler John Cena).  So, for the parents likely to be dragged to see MvA, here’s what you’re in for.
monsters-vs-aliens-poster
“The grandeur of the effects–the honest-to-God spectacle of the thing–elevates Monsters vs. Aliens to something approaching art. It’s not a masterpiece, but it’s most certainly a milestone.” Village Voice  Robert Wilonsky

Perhaps it was unfair of me to assume that only kids will like it.

The alien community of Earth will probably be upset by their depiction. Goodbye campaign donations.

The alien community of Earth will probably be upset by their depiction. Goodbye campaign donations.

“If the difference between a movie and an ad is substantial character, excitement and story, then Monsters vs. Aliens is officially a toy commercial.” Matt Pais Metromix.com

Perhaps not.  Paying 8 bucks to watch a 90-minute ad sounds less enjoyable than shaving my head with a nail file.  How about the whole 3D hullabaloo?

“If you have to see Monsters vs. Aliens – and if you’re a parent, you will have to – make sure it’s the 3-D version.” Boston Globe Ty Burr

“3-D is a distraction and an annoyance.” Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Huzzah for consensus!  No wait, that other thing.  Are there any lasting impressions that MvA should be lauded for?

I wish this story had gotten more coverage when it happened.  Damn media bias against lies.

I wish this story had gotten more coverage when it happened. Damn media bias against lies.

“This is a lean 90 minutes, packed with laughs and age-appropriate thrills — not to mention a solid lesson for girls about self-respect.” TV Guide  Perry Seibert

Huzzah again.

“Funny, but stumbles from scene to scene kind of like Lindsay Lohan stumbles out of the Roosevelt Hotel on a Friday night.” Willie Waffle WaffleMovies.com

That comparison lacks self-respect.  Anyhow, moving on to 12 Rounds, hopefully the title connects to boxing/wrestling rather than the amount of ammunition used.  Basically the plot can be summed up as ‘John Cena kicks ass.’  Very few reviewers have seen the movie as of opening day; however here are the good/bad slim picks:

12rounds_poster
“With wrestling powerhouse WWE producing, chances are the statement, “Guys, this just doesn’t make any sense,” never came up during a script meeting. I can’t fault 12 Rounds for being dumb. However, I will criticize 12 Rounds for being awful.” Brian Orndorf BrianOrndorf.com

“This big-budget action thriller excels at dishing out a plot that’s a bit like a chess game on speed.” Louise Keller Urban Cinefile

Somewhere between awful and speed chess lies the truth.  Last up, The Haunting in Connecticut (31% M -19% RT).  Right now, the scariest thing about this movie is the poster, it freaks me right the hell out.

haunting_in_connecticut“In the realm of domestic horror, The Haunting in Connecticut is about as scary as a shower that suddenly changes temperature when someone flushes the toilet.” Village Voice  Scott Foundas

AHHHHHH!

YAAAAAAAY!  Personally, I'm comforted by the fact that this dick isn't one of us.

YAAAAAAAY! Personally, I'm comforted by the fact that this dick isn't one of us.

“The Haunting in Connecticut is never particularly scary–making it a horror film for people who don’t really like horror films.” Mike Bracken The Horror Geek

And this from a self-described Horror Geek.

“Not very haunty.” New York Post  Kyle Smith

Say no more.  Have a pleasant weekend.

PDJ

PDJ

└ Tags: 12 rounds, haunting in connecticut, humor, monsters vs aliens, movie
Comments Off on Monsters go 12 haunting rounds in Connecticut with Aliens

Irish Holidays and Vacuum Cleaners

by Major Sheep on March 23, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Posted In: Uncategorized

I’ve been pretty incognito lately and decided it’s time to bring you all up to speed on what’s going on, and since it’s been so long, you get two weeks worth of funnies at once.  Here we go:

Last weekend, my wife got a long overdue (her words, not mine) haircut and decided to go for a Victoria Beckham style.

2009-03-23-blogcomic1

She had my full support.

Then, to celebrate the day that a Spanish priest threw all the snakes out of Ireland, my mother-in-law cooked a fantastic St. Patty’s day dinner of corned beef and veggies (cabbage was scarce, so we made do with brussel sprouts).

2009-03-23-blogcomic2

I was unable to detect the corn in the corned beef.

And I spent forever in a Michael’s trying to find a non-photo blue pencil.  No one there even knew what I was talking about.  It’s an art store for crying out loud!

I might as well have been asking for headlight fluid.

I might as well have been asking for headlight fluid.

Then, this last weekend, my wife and I took our hard-earned tax refund and bought a new vacuum cleaner.  One of the bagless “cyclonic power” ones.  It is now my official stance that a good vacuum should be a home/apartment/whatever-owner’s very first purchase.  Don’t bother with a coffee table, or enough shelves to hold all of your crap, or 16 whisks.  We’ve been using a ghetto POS for the last three years, and this is what we got after the first run with the new vacuum cleaner:

2009-03-23-blogcomic4

Actual size. No lie.

I’m not exaggerating, this thing picked up enough hair, dust and lint to stuff two grown cats.  We would vacuum a room, then stop and look at the see-through cyclone canister where the junk was collecting, and say, “Ewwww!”  It was like that Calvin and Hobbes strip with the mud patch.

The rest of my weekend was spent working on portfolio, drawing, drawing, and drawing.  Drawing what?  Well, stuff like this and this and this:

sketch-blah1

I drew so long and hard that my eyes started bleeding and fell out.

Gross ickyness has been digitally altered to stars and rainbows for the faint of heart.

Gross ickyness has been digitally altered to stars and rainbows for the faint of heart.

So that’s what I do for a good time.  I hope you enjoyed this comic blog in a way that enriches your body, mind, spirit, and taste buds.

Edit: I finally have the infamous “If Jesus…” image available as a print.  You can find it here on Etsy and there’s a link in the sidebar for future reference.  Thanks for the support everyone!

Ta!

Comments Off on Irish Holidays and Vacuum Cleaners

Knowing Duplicitous Love, Man

by King Sheep on March 20, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Posted In: Blog, movie reviews

After the last few weeks of movies you’ve probably never heard of, this week features a few movies that you are maybe sorta likely to have heard of.  There’s a Nick Cage movie about a time capsule full of numbers that predict disasters (which couldn’t predict its mediocre rating (Knowing: RT – 25% M – 40%).  Judd Apatow-inspired (but actually has no involvement in) I Love You, Man, which features the predictable stable of Apatow actors and the predictable critical adoration (RT 78% – M – 70%).  And two Hollywood heavyweights (Clive Owen and Julia Roberts) ham it up in the espionage comedy Duplicity (RT – 66% M – 69%).  Options options options.  To help us sort through our choices, Mr. Nick Cage will be our reviewer wingman.  Okay Nick, let’s get our heads dirty.

"Right with you King Sheep."

"Right with you King Sheep."

Okay, I said heads, but whatever.  I’ll try to make future wordplay more apparent.  Let’s go Apatow now!

i_love_you_man-poster

It should be no surprise to see these guys working together again.

The boys are back in town...and maybe each other

The boys are back in town...and maybe each other

“The movie delivers an absolutely complete, fully realized, delightfully novel redo of the hoariest of forms: the meet-cute, love-at-first-sight, break-up-and-make-up, racing-to-the-altar slapstick weepy that’s been a staple of cinema since the invention of cinema.” Village Voice  Robert Wilonsky

If that’s true then critics have been doing the trace-back-to-the-beginning, use-hyphens-to-invent-words, complications-reduced-to-one-simple-concept approach to review movies since the invention of writing.  Nick “in a” Cage, what do you say?

"Hi H.I."

"Hi H.I."

Great input.  Glad you’re here.

“The central love story, platonic though it may be, is entirely between the men. Their connection – and I’m determined to avoid the word “bromance” – saves this film from becoming just another Apatowian wanna-be.” New York Daily News  Elizabeth Weitzman

Sorry to break it to you, but you didn’t avoid using the word bromance in your review.  It’s like a lawyer who says “I don’t want to call it murder, but he killed the guy and it wasn’t self-defense.”  It’s already out there.  Nick, are you out there?

"Nah, but this hairdo is."

"Nah, but this hairdo is."

Fantastic.  You really know how to earn your paychecks sir.  Let’s hear from someone who didn’t like the movie very much, after all, it’s not posting Knocked Up (90%) or 40 Year Old Virgin (84%) numbers.

“Watching this movie is like listening to Michael Jackson tell you what real men are like.” New York Post Kyle Smith

Fantastic.  That’d be like Nick Cage telling you what real hair looks like.

"Just because my hair looks terrible doesn't mean it's more likely to be real."

"Just because my hair looks terrible doesn't mean it's more likely to be real."

Sorry, that was a low blow.  Actually, it was aimed a little higher than that.  Guess it was a high blow.  Moving on, let’s get duplicitous.

duplicity-movie-poster-11
“The movie resembles Mad magazine’s “Spy vs. Spy” series, elevated to labyrinthine levels of complexity.” Chicago Sun-Times  Roger Ebert

Sounds good, I used to love those silent-but-violent strips.

“Duplicity is perfectly titled: There isn’t a second of this smart, twisty, grown-up thriller in which someone isn’t lying, cheating or stealing, often from someone they claim to love.” Portland Oregonian  M. E. Russell

It is a rare thing to have a perfect title.

Can fashion ever be perfect if this was once cool?

Can fashion ever be perfect if this was once cool?

“On the plus side, if you’re flummoxed by the twisty plot or its occasional holes, you can always gaze contentedly at Clive Owen and be wholly entertained.” Miami Herald  Connie Ogle

I give up.  I can't be anymore sexy.

I give up. I can't be anymore sexy.

I’d question the merits of praising a movie just for the actor eye candy, but given the reviewer’s last name, what’s the point?  However, in fairness to men of the audience, will they be similarly excited to see Hollywood’s famous Pretty Woman?

“The female lead in Duplicity calls for the kind of atomic, glow-in-the-dark, Rita Hayworth-in-Gilda sexuality that is most assuredly out of Roberts’ range. Angelina Jolie effortlessly conjures up that kind of fire-breathing sexiness. Roberts? Not so much.” The Onion (A.V. Club)  Nathan Rabin

Ouch.  Sorry Julia, apparently your days of fire-breathing-sexiness are over.  Last up is our guest’s addition to your weekly entertainment options: Knowing.  Sure it’s at the bottom of the heap according to critics, but are they really the experts on mainstream disaster movies?

knowing-movie-poster“Knowing is among the best science-fiction films I’ve seen — frightening, suspenseful, intelligent and, when it needs to be, rather awesome.” Chicago Sun-Times  Roger Ebert

"Awesome!"

"Awesome!"

Indeed.

“Starts off mildly ridiculous, ascends to the full-blown ludicrous, and finally sails boldly off the edge of the absolutely preposterous.” Boston Globe  Ty Burr

That sounds like what I’d expect from a disaster movie.

“Reviewers sometimes insult actors by saying they don’t vary their expressions across an entire movie. But until Knowing, I never thought that could literally be true. Nicolas Cage does widen his eyes with about 15 minutes left in the film.” Charlotte Observer  Lawrence Toppman

"Hey, that's called acting"

"That's called acting"

“If you see only one bad movie this year, definitely make it Knowing. The first major disappointment from director Alex Proyas is a disaster movie, a horror picture, a “Da Vinci Code”-style thriller and an end-of-days religious film all at once.” San Francisco Chronicle Peter Hartlaub

That sounds like a so-bad-it’s-good movie.  Or four movies for the price of one.  Or perhaps just bad.  Nick, final thoughts?

"If you start to lose interest in my movie, just attach the View-Improver 2000 to your face and try not to blink, move, or breath deeply."

"If you start to get bored during my movie, just attach my patented View-Improver 2000 to your face and try not to blink, move, or breath deeply."

That’s great Nick.  You did such a good job I don’t think I ever need to invite you back.  Enjoy your weekend everyone.

Patrick-Darren-Johnson

Patrick-Darren-hyphen-Johnson

Comments Off on Knowing Duplicitous Love, Man

Two remakes and a piece of shit

by King Sheep on March 14, 2009 at 2:15 am
Posted In: Blog, movie reviews

If you decide to go see one of the three opening movies this weekend, be careful. Sometimes going to see a new movie is like going on a blind date. While the potential for joy and terror should be equal, actual experiences tend to lean negative. And this week’s suitors seem nice on the surface, but the reviews imply that each have a hand grenade of disappointment rolling around in their pockets. First, we pull the pin on Miss March (6%), a road-sex-comedy who’s biggest star is the velvet bathrobe patriarch of Playboy Mansion. With a rating in single digits, it’s the skeezy-mustache/smut-collector-type bachelor of this week’s movie dating game.

miss_march_one-sheet_movie_poster2

“A witless hodgepodge of gross-out gags that by comparison makes last summer’s ‘The House Bunny’ look like ‘Citizen Kane’.” Pete Hammond Hollywood.com

Bachelor #3, have you ever wondered if your whole reason for existing is to serve as a warning for others?

Hugh am I?

Hugh am I?

“Miss March is, to use the vernacular of the escapist moviegoer, the biggest pile of crap I’ve seen in ages.” Stephanie Zacharek Salon.com

Silver lining: at least it’s the best at being the worst.

“Cregger and Moore not only star in “Miss March,” they wrote and directed it too, which seems like a selfless act akin to throwing yourself on a live grenade, protecting any innocent careers around you from getting hit by flying shrapnel.” Rob Thomas Capital Times (Madison, WI)

Hey, thanks for bringing this roundup back to grenades (rhetorical symmetry) and giving us a nice insight into this film’s complete lack of entertainment value. But doesn’t any movie featuring Playboy bunnies at least appeal to young boys currently slogging through the quagmire of puberty?

“Even a 15-year-old boy would find this movie to be a chore.” Glenn Whipp Los Angeles Times

Guess not. Bachelor number #2 is a dark and intense remake of an early Wes Craven horror film: The Last House On The Left (44%). The premise is the terrifying exploration of sexual assault and revenge. As with any movie that probes truly dark and unsettling territory, the elements that some people praise are the same ones that make others want to retch.

last-house-on-left-poster

“Do not go to this movie if you simply seek entertainment. If you’re a sociologist tracking the decline of civilization over the past four decades, you’re in for a night of solid research.” Peter Howell Toronto Star

Wow. I’m afraid to ask what other professions are likely to be attracted to this movie.

“Has plenty of gore and a run-of-the-mill, unimaginative plot that feels tedious, pointless, inane and insipid.” Avi Offer NYC Movie Guru

Those are some negative words, so how about some vocab from the positive section.

“Enthralling, mature and full of measured tension. The Last House on the Left is no The Virgin Spring, but it beats the pants off of its direct thirty-seven-year-old predecessor.” Dustin Putman TheMovieBoy.com

If the original looks sleezy, is the remake blamed for following suit?

If the original looks sleezy, is the remake blamed for following suit?

Better than the original is usually a pretty good sign. Too bad I’d never heard of the original until the remake.

“Unlike the slew of Michael Bay- produced slasher remakes, this is not an idea-free flick. And Craven (shepherding producer on this remake) believes in character. More, he believes, in engaging what the word “horror” means.” Lisa Kennedy Denver Post

Definitely a ‘leave the kids at home’ type movie, unlike our last bachelor – the Disney remake of Race to Witch Mountain (37%). Anyone want to summarize the plot for those who did not grow up with the original?

race_to_witch_mountain_poster1

“Two brainiac outer space superteens who can translate dog barks into English, save the universe if not the world with help from The Rock and Watchman’s Silk Spectre Gugino, stuck at a UFO expo for true believers. Kid friendly but this trip needed more gas.” Prairie Miller NewsBlaze

Okay, this bachelor sounds a little nuts.

“The Rock charms you through the worst of it, but the effects are cheap, the dialogue is about as challenging as a Hannah Montana episode, and the pace manages to be both brisk and numbing.” Mike Russell Oregonian

Awesome…ly bad? It’s hard to tell if those comments are grudgingly negative or backhanded compliments. Clearly we need more data.

Watch out Grandpa!  They're using their alien super hug powers on you!

Watch out Grandpa! They're using their alien super hug powers on you!

“A flavorless sci-fi family picture that fools itself into thinking it is more grandiose than it is. Has all the thrills of a race between a slug and a hermit crab.” Dustin Putman TheMovieBoy.com

I bet a dollar on the slug.

“Bears all the signs of having been composed by an inferior race of alien screenwriters from the Hackulon System.” Kyle Smith New York Post

Nice one. Okay, so the plot isn’t original and the final effect is somewhere between ‘tolerable’ and ‘harmless,’ but it sounds like the Rock (or Dwayne Johnson) is mildly amusing.

The one fight he may never win is the battle to be taken seriously as an actor

The one fight he may never win is the battle to be taken seriously as an actor

“Instead of the next Schwarzenegger the Rock is the next Guttenberg and we have Disney to thank for it.” Joshua Tyler CinemaBlend.com

Thanks? Sounds like the Disney board of directors is made up of more than one Stonecutter member. All right, since all you have to choose from are two remakes and a piece of shit, let’s end with a dream of something better.

“If Disney insists on raiding its own vaults for remakes, maybe they’ll have better luck with The Laser-Vision, Missile-Launching, Face-Shredding Cat from Outer Space.” Alonso Duralde MSNBC

If lasers come out of my eyes, where do the missles come out of?

If lasers come out of my eyes, where do the missles come out of?

Patrick D. Johnson also known as PDJ also known as King Sheep

Patrick D. Johnson also known as PDJ also known as King Sheep

└ Tags: humor, Last House On The Left, Miss March, movies, Race To Witch Mountain
Comments Off on Two remakes and a piece of shit
  • Page 72 of 109
  • « First
  • «
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • »
  • Last »

Archives

DCMA Agent:

Dean A. Craine, P.S.  9 Lake Bellevue Drive, Ste. 209, Bellevue, WA  98005 (USA).  Telephone Number: (425) 637-3035; Email:  info@ nwpatents.com

©2007-2017 King Sheep Productions | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑